Who Actually Invented the Light Bulb: Edison vs Swan vs Tesla

Ask any child, and he will probably tell you that Thomas Edison invented the incandescent light bulb.

It’s a good story; one that relies on a popular myth of American individualistic invention. However, it’s definitely not the whole story.

In reality, the incandescent light bulb was the result of contributions from hundreds of inventors across the decades. Each one made certain improvements and refinements until, at last, there was an incandescent light bulb that made bringing electricity into the homes of billions of people possible.

Here is a brief look at some of the individuals who contributed to this effort.

Swan’s Light Bulb

Joseph Swan was just one inventor who made improvements in light bulb technology. He was working as a chemist in England in the middle of the nineteenth century when he began development of a more affordable light bulb. His invention replaced the previously used platinum filaments with carbonized paper filaments.

Unfortunately, for Swan, it turned out that while his carbonized paper filaments worked fairly well for demonstration purposes, they were not practical for everyday use. They simply burned out too quickly

The good news is that other inventors were waiting to make improvements to the light bulb.

Edison’s Light Bulb

We’ve already established that light bulbs were in existence even before Edison was born. One of his innovations was built directly on Joseph Swan’s incandescent light bulb.

Edison made the filaments thinner, giving them greater electrical resistance and ensuring that only a small amount of current was needed to create a glow. In 1879, Edison publicly demonstrated his refinements, which Swan quickly adopted. Swan then established an electrical lighting company in the U.K.

Edison sued, but the claims in Swan’s U.K. patent were strong. The two joined forces, forming Edison-Swan United and eventually becoming one of the largest light bulb manufacturers in the world.

In effect, Edison is credited with buying the patent for an incandescent light bulb. With these rights acquired, he was able to make improvements to the design that made it possible to provide electric light to the general public. Moreover, Edison was the consummate self-promoter, which enabled him to claim that he was solely responsible for the development of the light bulb.

Nonetheless, Edison was confronted with the massive problem of actually bringing electricity into American homes.

Tesla, the Light Bulb and Electric Current

Nikola Tesla was born in Europe in 1856. He emigrated to the U.S., where Edison sought him out in hopes of working together. Tesla helped bring new innovations to Edison’s inventions, but their working relationship didn’t last for long.

It appears that the two men disagreed on any number of topics. However, their most famous point of disagreement related to electric current. Edison was wholeheartedly behind the idea that direct current, or DC, was the way to bring electricity into homes.

Tesla believed that DC was insufficient and weak. Instead, he advocated for alternating current, or AC. With his invented induction motor, Tesla felt that it was possible sustain and regulate higher voltages using AC.

Edison and Tesla became embroiled in a nasty fight to prove the worthiness of their theories. In the end, it was Tesla who would triumph, and his AC system would be used to electrify America.


So, who actually invented the light bulb? The reality is that today’s light bulb is the result of countless hours of testing, trial and error by hundreds of different inventors over the course of more than 100 years.

Whether your invention is as revolutionary and necessary as the light bulb or has limited application within a particular industry, your innovation is worth protecting. Speak with an attorney from Williams IP Law to learn about all of the options that are available to you.

Why Intellectual Property Should be Protected

Many businesses have some kind of asset that they would like to protect. It may be a new gadget that everyone will want to buy or a process that makes life easier or safer. Additionally, if you’re using a name, logo or tagline to identify your goods or services, then it just makes sense to protect that mark with an official registration.

All of these assets are a form of intellectual property. When you invent a new product or process, then it’s sensible to protect that innovation by pursuing a patent. Maybe it’s wise to cover the code for your software with a copyright. Registering a trademark for the name of your product is one more common-sense measure that most entrepreneurs believe is essential to their success.

Have you invented a new product or process? Are you planning to sell your new gadget under a unique name? If so, then you probably have intellectual property that is worth protecting.

If this is your first foray into owning intellectual property, then you may not be certain why obtaining a patent or registering a trademark is necessary. The benefits of protecting your IP may not be obvious at first, but once you learn more about the rights that are granted to you as the holder of a patent, trademark or copyright, you’ll begin to see the value.

Protecting IP Lets You Keep Your Ideas

When you have a great idea, it’s only natural that others will want to copy it. However, when you hold a patent, trademark or copyright on your innovation, then you have the right to prevent others from infringing on your idea.

Holding a patent gives you the right to pursue legal remedies if you see that a competitor is using your invention on their products. Similarly, if someone is trying to sell a knock-off product with a logo that is confusingly similar to yours, then a registered trademark affords you a variety of legal protections. The same is true with copyrights. You can prevent other people from using your protected material when you have obtained an official copyright registration.

Protect the Growth of Your Business

When competitors steal your ideas or sell their products using a trademark that is confusingly similar to yours, then your bottom line may suffer. This is especially troubling for a new business that’s just trying to get off the ground. You’re attempting to establish your product and get people to notice it. With a nefarious actor out there, they are certain to steal some of your market share.

However, when you have carefully preserved your IP rights, then you have several legal remedies available to you. In fact, if you work with a qualified intellectual property attorney, you’ll have an ally who can help you keep an eye on competitors who may be engaging in infringing or unfair practices.

IP Can Be Security for Loans

Both new and established businesses may benefit from an influx of capital at various times. That’s because tasks such as research and development can be incredibly expensive and time-consuming. Investing in these costly tasks is less risky when you have the prospect of holding a monopoly on your IP, at least for a limited time.

If your organization is in need of capital to develop your idea or bring it to the market, then protecting your IP is critical to obtaining the money you need. Investors prefer to see that the project into which their money is going is protected by patents, trademarks and copyrights to better ensure an enhanced market share. Moreover, when you hold official IP rights, investors believe that your project is less risky and more likely to succeed.

When you protect your IP, you’re really protecting your business. It’s the best way to prevent others from wrongfully benefitting from your great ideas. After all, the inspiration was yours and you poured plenty of sweat into its development. Don’t you deserve to reap the benefits of all of your hard work?

Contact Williams IP Law to learn more about how you can protect your business by protecting your intellectual property. Obtaining protection via patents, trademarks and copyrights will help you to hold on to your ideas and grow your business.

How COVID-19 in Shaping Patent Law and Important Changes

As the Coronavirus spreads across the globe, scientists realized that this was an unknown virus. The medical tools that might be used to detect, treat and prevent it don’t exist.

Developing new tests and treatments requires time and money. Moreover, it’s necessary for these innovations to be tested and attain approval from the FDA or other agencies.

Here’s a look at some of the patent-related efforts that are underway to fight COVID-19.

What is the Facilitating Innovation to Fight Coronavirus Act?

Recently, a bill was drafted in the U.S. Its goal is removing barriers to inventing medical interventions that may be able to prevent or treat COVID-19.

Legal analysts tend to agree that the proposed legislation is a hodgepodge of laudable ideas and unintended consequences. The proposed act contains two sections, the first of which protects individuals from liability lawsuits arising from Coronavirus treatments.

The second section suspends the patent rights of certain medical products and provides a 10-year patent term extension beginning after the pandemic.

Analysts tend to see little problem with the first section, but the second one is causing concern. Critics feel that it’s just too vague. Biomedical firms heavily invest in new products. They bear these expenses because of the exclusivity that’s granted to them through a patent, which means that they may recoup their costs.

Unfortunately, the proposed legislation is too vague about how a new patent application that covers relevant technology would be treated. Does the clock on its term not start until the end of the pandemic, and then is the patent eligible for an additional 10 years?

If the law passes as written, it would mean that the inventors no longer had “exclusive” rights, which is one of the primary reasons why patents are pursued. Moreover, inventors would have to worry about infringing actions occurring at a time when they should enjoy perfect exclusivity.

How will patent owners re-establish exclusivity when the pandemic is over? The invention will have entered the public domain, making this a potentially impossible task.

Hopefully, this bill will be clarified before being adopted.

Patent Protections and Relaxation During the Pandemic

The relaxation of patent protections is occurring around the world In Israel, the government wants to made use of Abbvie’s drug known as Kaletra to treat COVID-19, but there isn’t enough of it in the country. Abbvie held patents in several countries for Kaletra, many of which have which expired.

Their Israeli patent is still in force, so that government is looking at obtaining generic Kaletra from another country, such as India, where the patent has expired.

In response, Abbvie announced that they would cease patent enforcement with regard to Kaletra, paving a cooperative way forward.

This approach makes sense in the case of a drug that’s near the end of its patentable life. Nonetheless, it’s vital that governments always consult with patent holders before looking for ways around their rights.

Lengthening Patent Terms and its Effect on Innovators

Governments are seeking to prevent innovators from profiteering from Coronavirus. They mainly are accomplishing this by passing legislation that allows them to produce any patented item that might help in the fight.

The U.S. government’s approach is different. The Coronavirus-relief bills provide billions of dollars’ worth of public research money to federal agencies to develop treatments and vaccines. Is it ethical for a government agency to receive an additional 10-year patent term on life-saving treatments or vaccines that should be freely available?

Many critics don’t think so, citing the stance taken by Jonas Salk when he developed the polio vaccine. Salk declared that his innovation needed to be owned by the public, and people say that the same approach should apply here.

Will the thought of not having the exclusive right to profit from a vaccine or treatment stop innovators? It’s possible, but there’s hope that an altruistic spirit will motivate the right inventors to find a cure.

COVID-19 Innovations & Keeping Your IP Safe

Despite the current uncertainty with regard to patent protection for Coronavirus-related technologies, it’s wise to seek patent protection. With shortages of items like face masks and medicines, there’s a proliferation of adulterated or counterfeit goods. Pursuing a patent gives you the right to prevent this.

In the spirit of cooperation, educational institutions, government agencies and biomedical firms are pledging to make their COVID-19 research freely available without enforcing patent rights. Whether your invention helps to stop the pandemic or not, contact Williams IP Law to discuss how to protect your IP.

Intellectual Property Search Basics

Patent Protection

It’s important to remember that the patent search is only one step in a much longer process. If the results of the search are favorable, then drafting the patent application may begin.

The inventor is by no means required to immediately pursue patent protection after a search is completed. However, there may be benefits to filing an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office with all possible speed.

The U.S. is now a “first to file” country, which means that the first inventor to file an application for new technology is the individual who is deemed to be the originator of the idea and therefore eligible for a patent.

This contrasts with the prior U.S. system under which a “first to invent” rule was followed. Under this system, an inventor who could produce documentation showing that they were the originator of a product or process could prevail over another inventor who filed their application first.

Accordingly, inventors may feel a great deal of pressure to immediately pursue patent protection. This is where the advice of a qualified intellectual property attorney becomes indispensable.

Your attorney can help you to determine whether or not your invention is sufficiently well-developed to pursue patent protection. If you are still deep in the development process, then your attorney may recommend filing a provisional patent application.

Such an application preserves an earlier filing date for your invention while also providing you with one year in which you may continue to develop the technology. You may rely on the guidance of your IP attorney during this time. At the end of the year, you may file a non-provisional patent application that more completely describes your invention. This application will be examined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and it also may issue as a patent.

Should I Do A Trademark Search?

It is always advisable to do a trademark search before you proceed with selecting a name for a business, band name, slogan, or any other symbol, mark, or terminology to represent your product and service to the public.

Typically it is best to do the trademark search at the very first stages of the process. Costs and efforts associated in getting a new product to the market, branding, and advertising can be relatively high.

It can be disheartening, frustrating, and harmful to your business to begin such a process without first making sure you trademark is clear from potential issues. It is common to see demand letters for infringement when a proper trademark search was not performed prior to using a mark.

There are 45 trademark classes which are essentially categories of marks split based on the type of the good or service that can be registered by the USPTO. It can be a tedious process to search this on your own with all of the different options available.

It’s also important to search for unregistered trademarks because even though a trademark is unregistered it could still prevent you registering your trademark and could still lead to trademark infringement.

The cost to perform a search is extremely small when compared to trademark infringement.

To learn more about the patent and trademark search process set up a FREE Consultation with Jeff Williams.

Differences Between Patent Engineers, Patent Agents and Patent Attorneys

The Inventors Expertise

Inventors frequently are experts in their particular field. They understand the pertinent technology, and they have developed an innovation that may revolutionize the field.

It’s only natural for this individual to want to obtain a patent on their invention. Occasionally, inventors are tempted to draft a patent application and to try to prosecute it without assistance. This generally ends up being a costly error.

Although the inventor possesses incredibly detailed knowledge of their invention, they do not have any training or experience when it comes to writing a proper patent specification. Moreover, they likely do not have the legal knowledge that is necessary to complete prosecution. This lack of experience and knowledge may cause them to make a fatal error that precludes them from obtaining any patent protection.

Working with a professional in the intellectual property field can help to prevent this situation. It also ensures that you don’t end up with a patent that is so broad that it is essentially meaningless or with one that is so narrow in scope that it doesn’t provide any protection.

Most of these professionals work in intellectual property law firms. Patent engineers, patent agents and patent attorneys all may work together to ensure that your invention gets the legal protection that it deserves. What are the differences between these patent professionals?

Patent Engineers

A person who works as a patent engineer must have considerable specialized knowledge in a scientific or technical field. While they have not passed the patent bar and are not a lawyer, they still are able to perform numerous essential functions.

Patent engineers may perform searches in various databases to discover prior art for a particular invention. This may help with a decision regarding whether or not patent protection may be available for a certain innovation. The engineer may write reports or even provide much of the detail for the specification of the patent application.

Occasionally, the patent engineer works closely with the inventor to better understand the new product or process so that it can be adequately described in the specification.

Patent Agents

Like patent engineers, patent agents have a great deal of knowledge in scientific or technical areas. It’s not unusual for these professionals to hold a graduate degree or a Ph.D. Moreover, they have passed the Patent Bar Exam before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. This qualifies them to file patent applications, advise clients as to the patentability of their inventions and to assess prior art.

While patent agents are qualified to handle almost any patent prosecution matter before the USPTO, they are expressly prohibited from providing legal advice. Accordingly, clients who need legal counsel for any business-related matter that is connected to their pursuit of a patent will need to work with a patent attorney.

One of the main advantages of working with a patent agent as opposed to a patent attorney is the cost. Their hourly rates tend to be more affordable.

Patent Attorneys

A patent attorney is essentially a patent agent who also holds a legal degree. Like engineers and agents, these attorneys must have formal education in a scientific or technical area. This may include a Bachelor of Science, Master of Science or a Ph.D. These professionals then attend law school, and they must pass the bar exam in the state where they intend to practice.

Next, they must pass the Patent Bar Exam to practice before the USPTO. With their education and background, patent attorneys are prepared to handle all facets of patent prosecution. This may include litigation if a patent is being infringed.

While it may cost more to hire a patent attorney than a patent agent, it is typically worth the expense. Working with a patent attorney provides you with all of the knowledge and skill that you’ll need to negotiate the process of pursuing patent protection.

As all of these patent professionals typically are employed by an intellectual property law firm, it is likely that an inventor may encounter at least two and perhaps all three of these professionals. Each one is working toward the same goal of obtaining the broadest, most meaningful and enforceable protection that is available for your invention.
Author: Jeff Williams

Jeff Williams is an experienced mechanical engineer and lawyer that consults closely with clients in a strait forward and clear manner. He brings a particular set of strengths and unique perspectives to the firm.

Jeff received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Arizona State University in 2005. He was an engineer for a number of years at a number of large corporations before pursuing his law degree. He graduated from Texas A&M University School of Law (formerly Texas Wesleyan University School of Law) with a J.D. in 2010. By combining his education and prior work experience into the field of intellectual property law, Jeff has developed key skills to fully assist clients.

Lego Builds a Winning Case

The Lego Group

Lego is one of the largest toy manufacturers in the world, and they popularized the idea of creating building blocks and small construction pieces to create magnificent figures and products. Lego is being used also for engineering and robotics, and they have been funding for technological inventions that are using their products as a prototype. The Lego Group, which is the mother company of Lego, is based in Denmark, and the company started to operate back in the year 1949, four years after the Second World War ended. As of the year 2015, the company is proud to say that they have already manufactured their 600 billionth piece. The company’s influential in the toy manufacturing industry allowed them to become recognized as one of the most powerful brands in the world by Brand Finance, replacing Ferrari in the process.

The popularity of Lego across the world spawned different theme parks and amusement centers that are catered to the children and the adults. The Lego Group is gaining a lot of money from these ventures, but they are also facing losses partly because of copyright infringement. Because of the popularity of the toys that they create, many counterfeit products have entered the market. These fake products are being sold at lower prices, and the target markets are the poor people from Africa, Asia, and South America. The Lego Group started to flex their arms against those who continually make fake products that carry their brand name and copying their designs for profit.

More information about copyright infringement

Copyright Infringement is the unlawful copying of a product or services that is patented without permission from the owners. It is a massive problem in China, and many small manufacturers in the country are creating fake products that are sold in the black market. Other manufacturers in China are copying the design of shoes, clothes, and even devices, and they are putting a different brand name into it and then selling it to the public. The problem concerning the manufacturing of fake products is widespread, and the government of China decided to control the issue by giving a warning to those who will continue to do the practice. However, people are not listening to their government, and they still continue making these products because of the high demand in the market.

Lego’s market in China

Lego has a huge market in China, and the Lego Group even decided to build a manufacturing facility in the country to take advantage of their affordable labor. The Lego Group is also planning to build a Legoland theme park in Shanghai, China to cater to their Chinese customers. Lego is also earning huge in the country, and because of the support from the public, The Lego Group was able to expand in the country, opening 140 shops in more than 30 cities across the country. In 2017, The Lego Group was able to generate a $1.1 billion profit, and the Chinese market contributed a lot to this figure.

Lego wins big over the last two years

The Lego Group filed a case against four Chinese manufacturers that are creating toys that pose huge similarities with Legos. The court in China directed the manufacturers to pay The Lego Group more than $600,000 in damages. This is not the first time that Lego is involved in infringement cases. In the past, they have also run after those who are trying to copy their designs and filed cases that gave them the edge in the toy manufacturing industry. The Lego Group stated that the battle against fake products will continue, and they will use all of their networks and resources to stop these people from copying their well-beloved colorful blocks.

How Lego would face other companies that would try to copy their products and services

The Lego Group provided a clear warning to those who will continue creating fake products and copying their design – they will never stop until justice has been served. The company wanted to dominate the market, and they will stop anyone who will pose a threat against their properties.


The Lego Group continues to manufacture colorful blocks that appeal to all ages. The company is also growing steadily, touching down new markets and expanding on the existing ones.

Free Intellectual Property Consultation

Amazon Acknowledges Counterfeit Problem on Marketplace Platform

Amazon is one of the top retailers in the world, second only to Walmart. It generates billions of dollars in revenue each year, but only about half of that revenue comes from Amazon itself selling products.

The other half of the company’s revenue is generated by Amazon Marketplace sales. Marketplace operates like eBay in that it provides a platform on which buyers and sellers may meet and conduct transactions. Amazon isn’t involved in the process, but they do collect a fee from each sale as their due for hosting the transaction.

It’s a smart business model, but it doesn’t come without risk. In its annual 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the retail giant mentioned for the first time the risks that come with enabling the sale of potentially counterfeit products.

What Are Counterfeit Products?

Counterfeit consumer goods, which also may be referred to as knock-offs, are products that are sold under the brand name of a person or entity that did not actually authorize or manufacture the product. Counterfeiters hope to make easy money by selling merchandise that they purport to come from a reputable company. Unfortunately, what they are selling typically is of inferior quality.

This is a major financial and reputational problem for the maker of the authentic goods. Too frequently, consumers don’t realize that what they are buying isn’t the genuine article. When they receive an item that quickly falls apart or doesn’t function as advertised, they blame the maker of the brand-name item, which didn’t have anything to do with the counterfeit.

This is a headache for big-name companies, but it can be absolutely disastrous for start-ups and other small companies. Large organizations more frequently have the deep pockets that may be necessary to combat counterfeit goods. However, small businesses don’t have those resources. The reputational damage that they suffer as a result of counterfeiting may destroy them.

Counterfeits on Amazon

Amazon’s main business model is to buy products from manufacturers wholesale so that these items can be sold to customers at a discount. Accordingly, they have measures in place to ensure that they aren’t contracting to buy knock-offs. When consumers purchase an item that comes from the Amazon Retailer tier of the business, they can rest assured that they probably are getting the real thing.

That changes when consumers are dealing with Amazon Marketplace. Although Amazon says that they try to take steps to ensure the authenticity of the goods on the Marketplace, it is ultimately only the seller’s word that backs up the items they sell. When consumers receive products that clearly are inferior, both Amazon and the purported manufacturer get the blame.

Amazon’s Form 10-K Annual Report

Each year, Amazon files a Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, reporting their year-end earnings for the prior year. In the report covering 2018, Amazon added a notation to shareholders that acknowledges that the sale of counterfeit items on the platform is a risk.

Amazon further acknowledged that they may not be able to prevent nefarious sellers from receiving money for transactions in which buyers never receive a product or when the consumer receives a product that is demonstrably different from the advertised product.

This is the first official acknowledgment from Amazon that counterfeit consumer goods are a growing problem. However, manufacturers like Williams-Sonoma, Daimler AG and Elevation Lab have long been complaining that the retailer isn’t doing enough to curb the sale of counterfeit items on its website.

In addition, Williams-Sonoma and Daimler have filed trademark infringement lawsuits against Amazon based on the appearance of their registered marks on advertisements for counterfeit products.

Another startling claim has emerged from Apple, which says that it believes that fully 90 percent of the items sold on Amazon that purportedly come from Apple are actually fakes.

Amazon finally is acknowledging that it has a counterfeit problem, but it doesn’t yet have an effective means for eliminating it. This means that it is up to the manufacturers of legitimate goods to protect their reputation and revenue by seeking intellectual property protection. Obtaining and enforcing official patent, trademark and copyright coverage are among the most effective tools that organizations can use to protect their interests.

Free Consultation
Author: Jeff Williams

Jeff Williams is an experienced mechanical engineer and lawyer that consults closely with clients in a strait forward and clear manner. He brings a particular set of strengths and unique perspectives to the firm.

Jeff received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Arizona State University in 2005. He was an engineer for a number of years at a number of large corporations before pursuing his law degree. He graduated from Texas A&M University School of Law (formerly Texas Wesleyan University School of Law) with a J.D. in 2010. By combining his education and prior work experience into the field of intellectual property law, Jeff has developed key skills to fully assist clients.

Social Media Username Jacking

The Joys of Social Media

Social media represents a wonderful opportunity for businesses to connect with their customers and to get the word out about specials, promotions and new products. It seems like there are new social media platforms cropping up all the time, and though it probably isn’t necessary to join them all, it certainly makes sense to choose one, two or even three that align comfortably with your company’s image and the product or service that it provides.

However, what do you do when you discover that another entity or individual has already registered your preferred company name on a particular social media platform? Sometimes this is merely the result of two companies having similar names. At other times, another user has registered your company name in a scheme known as username jacking.

What Is Username Jacking?

In some ways, username jacking is a bit like domain squatting. An entity or individual scoops up likely domain names for well-known celebrities or brands then hopes to cash in when said celebrity or brand wants to take over the domain for their own use.

The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, Or UDRP, is the accepted mechanism for resolving disagreements over the registration of domain names. However, there is no such mechanism in place when someone sets up a fake social media account using your name or the name of your business. Sometimes, these accounts are set up with the goal of criticizing your company. On other occasions, someone is seeking to malign your good name. It also is possible that another entity, perhaps your competitor, wants to make it difficult for you to gain prominence on that social media platform.

The idea of some unknown entity using your name to make social media posts can be troubling. There’s always the chance that your customers will see that username and believe that it belongs to you. You definitely don’t want to deal with any fallout from customers believing that they are interacting with you when they are actually interacting with someone who’s only pretending to be you.

What Can You Do About Username Jacking?

It’s vital to protect your intellectual property, especially since your name and brand help to solidify your reputation in the minds of consumers. When you find that someone has jacked your username, go straight to the complaint department for that social media platform. Their terms of use probably set up guidelines for complaining about false accounts. Some platforms have more clear-cut rules than others. Accordingly, this may not provide all of the help that you need. If the rules are sufficient, then the administrators at the social media platform will likely shut down or transfer the rogue account to you.

However, if the administrators say that they cannot help you and the owner of the account ignores your demands, then you may be forced to file a lawsuit. This may seem like an extreme response, but it also is a response that gets noticed. It typically is not advisable to sue the platform itself, as the administrators will argue that they generally are not responsible for posts made by users. Your intellectual property attorney will probably recommend suing the individual or entity behind the bogus account, a process that may involve subpoenaing the social media platform for data concerning the owner.

Speak with an Intellectual Property Attorney

A lawyer who focuses their efforts in this area of law is uniquely qualified to guide you through the process of identifying and potentially suing someone who is misusing your name or brand in the cyber world. While there is not as yet a great deal of case law in this area, legal precedent is growing by the year. Contact a skillful attorney today to learn more about the options that may be available to you.

Free Consultation
Author: Jeff Williams

Jeff Williams is an experienced mechanical engineer and lawyer that consults closely with clients in a strait forward and clear manner. He brings a particular set of strengths and unique perspectives to the firm.

Jeff received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Arizona State University in 2005. He was an engineer for a number of years at a number of large corporations before pursuing his law degree. He graduated from Texas A&M University School of Law (formerly Texas Wesleyan University School of Law) with a J.D. in 2010. By combining his education and prior work experience into the field of intellectual property law, Jeff has developed key skills to fully assist clients.